The legal basis after Common Cause 2018 and the 2023 modification, DNAR, the two-medical-board process and ISCCM guidance.
At the bedside
- 1
Establish futility or the patient's wish
Terminal illness or irreversible condition with no reasonable hope of recovery, or a capable patient refusing treatment, or a valid advance directive.
- 2
Capable patient
An adult with capacity may refuse any treatment including life support; document the capacity assessment and informed refusal.
- 3
Primary Medical Board
≤ 48 hHospital board of the treating physician and at least two subject experts with ≥ 5 years experience; decision within 48 h (2023 modification).
- 4
Secondary Medical Board
≤ 48 hHospital board including a registered medical practitioner nominated by the district Chief Medical Officer and at least two subject experts (≥ 5 years); decision within 48 h; the JMFC is informed.
- 5
Family consent
Consent of the next of kin / guardian recorded; if the board refuses, family may approach the High Court.
- 6
DNAR / limitation orders
Withholding CPR or escalation (DNAR, 'allow natural death') is a medical decision taken with the family, documented with reasons and reviewed; it does not mean withdrawing other care.
- 7
Implement compassionately
Continue comfort care, symptom control and family support; withdraw treatments in a planned sequence (see palliative-symptom-care).
Key legal points (India)
| Issue | Position |
|---|---|
| Active euthanasia | Illegal |
| Withholding/withdrawing futile life support | Lawful following the Common Cause procedure |
| Capable adult refusing treatment | Right to refuse recognised |
| Advance directive (living will) | Valid; signed before 2 witnesses and attested by notary or gazetted officer (2023) |
| Medical boards | Primary and secondary boards, each within 48 h; JMFC informed |
Summary for clinicians, not legal advice; check hospital policy and legal counsel.
References
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Limiting life-sustaining treatment (India)
Step 1 of ~3
Decision: Patient has decision-making capacity?
Based on Supreme Court of India; Supreme Court of India. Educational use; follow local protocol.
Pathophysiology
Not applicable - ethical and legal framework.
Evidence
- Common Cause judgment 2018 and 2023 modification [Supreme Court 2018; Supreme Court 2023].
- ISCCM 2012 ethical position statement [Chawla 2012]; ISCCM/IAPC 2024 [Kapadia 2024].
- ACCM end-of-life recommendations [Truog 2008].
Controversies
- Practical feasibility of medical boards in smaller hospitals; withdrawal of artificial nutrition; absence of specific legislation.
🇮🇳 India notes
- Many Indian ICUs still avoid formal withdrawal and rely on DAMA/LAMA discharge; ISCCM/IAPC advocate open, documented end-of-life decisions.
- Keep a hospital SOP and template forms for medical board decisions; check state-level notifications for CMO nominee panels.
References
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Test yourself
Module quiz · score 70% to complete the module
Previous
Family meetings and shared decision-making
Next
Palliative symptom care and compassionate extubation
Educational reference for trained clinicians. Check doses against your hospital protocol and the patient in front of you.

