ECMO and mechanical circulatory support

VV vs VA ECMO: modes and indications

Reviewed Nov 2026·8 references
New· views rounded down, updated weekly

How the two ECMO configurations work, who each is for, contraindications, and the physiology a junior must understand before touching the circuit.

Definition
ECMO pumps blood through an artificial membrane lung. VV ECMO drains venous blood and returns it oxygenated to the venous side (gas exchange only; relies on the native heart). VA ECMO drains venous blood and returns it into the arterial system (supports circulation and gas exchange, in parallel with the native heart).

At the bedside

Timed steps
  1. 1

    Name the failing organ

    0 min

    Lungs only with adequate heart function → VV ECMO (gas exchange support). Heart failing (± lungs) → VA ECMO (circulatory + gas exchange support). Do a bedside echo before deciding: severe LV/RV failure on VV may need VA or a hybrid configuration.

  2. 2

    Optimise conventional care first

    Before ECMO

    Severe ARDS: lung-protective ventilation (VT 6 mL/kg PBW, Pplat ≤30, driving pressure ≤15), PEEP titration, neuromuscular blockade, and prone positioning ≥12–16 h/day unless contraindicated. Shock: fluids if responsive, noradrenaline, inotropes, revascularisation, treat arrhythmia.

  3. 3

    Check VV indications (ELSO 2021)

    Decide

    Any of: PaO₂/FiO₂ <80 mmHg after optimal care including a prone trial; hypercapnic failure with pH <7.25 despite RR 35/min and Pplat ≤30; bridge to lung transplant. EOLIA entry (used by many centres): P/F <50 for >3 h, P/F <80 for >6 h, or pH <7.25 with PaCO₂ ≥60 mmHg for >6 h despite optimisation.

  4. 4

    Check VA indications

    Decide

    Refractory cardiogenic shock (SCAI D–E) despite vasopressors/inotropes, with a plan (recovery, durable VAD, transplant or decision): fulminant myocarditis, massive PE with arrest/shock, post-cardiotomy shock, cardiotoxic poisoning (e.g. calcium-channel blocker, aluminium phosphide), refractory VT/VF storm, primary graft failure; and ECPR in selected refractory arrests.

  5. 5

    Screen contraindications

    Decide

    Absolute: no exit strategy (irreversible disease, not a transplant/VAD candidate). Relative: intracranial haemorrhage or major brain injury, contraindication to anticoagulation, >7 days of high-pressure ventilation (Pplat >30 and FiO₂ >0.9), advanced age or frailty, end-stage malignancy, severe immunosuppression. For VA: significant aortic regurgitation and aortic dissection.

  6. 6

    Call the ECMO centre early

    Act

    Discuss with the regional ECMO team while the patient is still transportable; calculate RESP (VV) or SAVE (VA) to frame the discussion, not to decide alone.

VV vs VA ECMO at a glance

FeatureVV ECMOVA ECMO
SupportsGas exchange onlyCirculation + gas exchange
Typical cannulaeFemoral drainage (23–25 Fr) + internal jugular return (17–21 Fr), or a single dual-lumen bicaval cannula via right IJPeripheral: femoral venous drainage (21–25 Fr) + femoral arterial return (15–19 Fr) with a distal perfusion cannula (6–8 Fr); central (post-cardiotomy): RA + aorta
Typical blood flow60–80 mL/kg/min (adult often 4–6 L/min)Enough for cardiac index ~2.2–2.5 L/min/m² (adult often 3–5 L/min); use the lowest flow that maintains perfusion
Oxygenation targetSaO₂ 85–92% often acceptable (mixing with native venous return)Normal saturations; check the right radial ABG for differential hypoxia
Main physiology problemsRecirculation; hypoxaemia with high cardiac outputLV distension, differential (north–south) hypoxia, limb ischaemia
Native heart mustPump the oxygenated blood through the lungsEject at least partly (aortic valve opening) to avoid LV stasis

Cannula sizes are typical adult ranges; the ECMO team chooses size from ultrasound vessel diameter and target flow.

Common indications

ModeConditions
VVARDS (viral, bacterial, aspiration), severe asthma, pulmonary haemorrhage/DAH, inhalational injury, chest trauma/contusion, large bronchopleural fistula, bridge to or after lung transplant
VASelected AMI cardiogenic shock, fulminant myocarditis, massive PE, post-cardiotomy shock, decompensated cardiomyopathy as bridge, refractory arrhythmia, cardiotoxic poisoning, peripartum cardiomyopathy, hypothermic arrest, ECPR
Red flag · call your senior now
P/F <80 mmHg on FiO₂ 1.0 despite proning and paralysis: the ECMO window is closing — refer now.
Red flag
Rising lactate, falling urine output and escalating vasopressor plus inotrope (SCAI C→D): mechanical support discussion must happen within hours.
Red flag
New intracranial bleed or uncontrolled bleeding: anticoagulated ECMO may be lethal — consultant decision.
Red flag
On peripheral VA ECMO: loss of arterial pulsatility with pink frothy secretions = LV distension; needs urgent unloading.
Pitfall
Starting ECMO before a genuine trial of prone positioning: ELSO lists a prone trial as part of optimal management unless contraindicated.
Pitfall
Choosing VV for a patient with severe septic cardiomyopathy: the native heart must still pump the oxygenated blood; echo first.
Pitfall
Referring after 7+ days of injurious ventilation: outcomes fall with longer pre-ECMO ventilation (a strong negative weight in RESP).
Pearl
VV ECMO SaO₂ is rarely 100%: arterial saturation reflects the mix of oxygenated circuit blood and native venous return. 85–90% is often fine if oxygen delivery and lactate are adequate.
Pearl
'Sweep for CO₂, flow for O₂': CO₂ clearance is controlled by sweep gas flow; oxygenation mainly by blood flow (and FdO₂).
Pearl
Lower PaCO₂ slowly after initiation: rapid CO₂ falls are associated with neurological injury. ELSO suggests starting sweep around 2 L/min and titrating.

Calculators for this topic

References

  1. 1

    Tonna JE, Abrams D, Brodie D, et al. Management of Adult Patients Supported with Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO): Guideline from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). ASAIO J. 2021;67(6):601-610.

  2. 2

    Lorusso R, Shekar K, MacLaren G, et al. ELSO Interim Guidelines for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Cardiac Patients. ASAIO J. 2021;67(8):827-844.

  3. 3

    Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (EOLIA). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1965-1975.

  4. 4

    Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR). Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351-1363.

  5. 5

    Thiele H, Zeymer U, Akin I, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK). N Engl J Med. 2023;389(14):1286-1297.

  6. 6

    Ostadal P, Rokyta R, Karasek J, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2023;147(6):454-464.

  7. 7

    Naidu SS, Baran DA, Jentzer JC, et al. SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):933-946.

  8. 8

    Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720-3826.

Test yourself

Module quiz · score 70% to complete the module

Educational reference for trained clinicians. Check doses against your hospital protocol and the patient in front of you.